I know it sounds simplistic, but we can always use more trails and there are thousands of people unemployed, so why not utilize an underutilized work force?
We are already paying unemployment benefits, so it wouldn’t cost much more than what we’re already paying. It just seems to make so much sense to employ those same people to build and improve our network of trails.
 |
| A little trail goes a long ways. |
Let’s look at the possible benefits:
- It would provide employment.
- It would give us more and better trails.
- It would improve the self esteem of the unemployed.
- It might encourage some to find other work.
- It would promote alternative transportation.
- It would introduce more people to our incredible national trail system.
- It would promote active lifestyles.
- It would help unemployed people to get out and network and learn new skills.
As I write this list, I realize I could go on much longer, but I’ll stop there and close by giving a quick look at the facts:
- We have legions of people who are unemployed and receiving unemployment benefits/income.
- We have land currently available for trail building. (federal land, open space, abandoned rail corridors, etc.)
- Trail building does not require highly skilled/specialized labor (for most trail corridors).
- Most segments of trail do not require costly or sophisticated tools, machinery, or supplies. (Certain trail segments need bridges, asphalt, & concrete, but even those segments can benefit from a certain amount of good old sweat equity to lay the foundation.)
Just think what we could accomplish if all the players/entities worked together: government, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, American Trails, National Park Service, cities, towns, states, individuals, corporations
Just like the Conservation Corps from the past, we could build a legacy that could be enjoyed by millions right now and for generations in the future.
2 comments
You make way to much sense to be taken seriously.
You make way to much sense to be taken seriously.